What to send
Read-only account access, screenshots, exports, or the campaigns you want reviewed first.
Most accounts we review are leaking spend somewhere: bad match types, missing negatives, broken conversion tracking, or landing pages that don't match the ad. We'll show you exactly where.
When the issue is fixable, the next step usually sits inside Google Ads management, PPC management, Shopping campaigns, product feed optimization, landing pages, or eCommerce conversion tracking.
Where budget is leaking to search terms, placements, or audiences that were never going to convert.
Match types, search term reports, and the negative keyword list you are probably missing.
Why some ad groups pay more per click than they should, and what is dragging the score down.
Whether the conversions Google reports actually match real leads and sales, and where attribution breaks.
Whether the page behind the click actually matches the ad promise, and where that mismatch costs you.
Campaign structure, bidding strategy, and budget allocation checked against how the account is actually performing.
A Google Ads audit checks whether the account is buying qualified intent or simply collecting clicks. We look at search terms, match types, negatives, conversion tracking, bidding logic, landing-page fit, and whether budgets are aligned with real commercial value.
Start here if spend is rising but leads, sales, or lead quality are not improving.
Share campaign access or screenshots for search terms, conversions, and landing pages where possible.
The useful output is a waste-and-opportunity list before any scaling decision is made.
Read-only access is ideal, but screenshots of your campaigns, search terms, and conversion setup work too. We just need enough to see what is really happening.
A short, practical path from request to recommendation.
Read-only account access, screenshots, exports, or the campaigns you want reviewed first.
Spend leaks, search terms, negatives, quality score, conversion tracking, bidding, and landing pages.
A ranked list of what to pause, fix, test, or restructure to reduce wasted spend.
Either read-only account access or exports/screenshots of the key reports — whichever is easier for you.
Spend, targeting, quality score, tracking, and landing pages, checked against your actual results.
What to pause, what to fix, and what to test next, ordered by likely impact on cost per lead.
Request it when spend is rising, lead quality is weak, conversions are unclear, or you want to know whether wasted search terms, landing pages, bidding, or tracking are limiting performance.
Access helps, but it is not always required for the first pass. Screenshots of search terms, conversions, campaign structure, landing pages, and recent performance can be enough to identify the main issues.
Yes. For ecommerce, we look at Shopping campaigns, product feed quality, conversion tracking, landing-page fit, and whether revenue data is reliable enough to guide budget decisions.
Anonymised client feedback from businesses that needed clearer priorities, sharper pages, and work tied to actual enquiries.
We thought the issue was just traffic. HGM showed us that our product pages were not explaining the offer clearly enough. The changes were practical, the reporting was easy to follow, and the enquiries we got afterwards were a better fit.
We had a long list of SEO tasks and no idea what mattered first. HGM helped us sort the technical issues from the things that were actually stopping people from contacting us. It felt much more useful than another generic audit.
Our services made sense to us internally, but they were confusing on the website. HGM helped us split the pages properly, rewrite the vague sections, and make the next step clearer for visitors. The site finally felt easier to explain.
They did not try to rewrite everything for the sake of it. They pointed out where buyers were likely getting stuck, tightened the calls to action, and made the page feel more trustworthy without making it sound like a sales script.
We had separate people looking at content, tracking, and the website, but no one was joining it up. HGM looked at the whole path and gave us a clear order of fixes. The conversations from the site became easier to qualify.
The most useful part was the directness. We did not need a long presentation full of charts; we needed to know why the pages were not converting and what to fix first. That is what we got.