What to send
Your domain, platform, and any migration, crawl, indexing, or ranking concern.
Great content on a technically broken site still loses. We will check whether search engines can actually crawl, index, and understand your pages — and flag exactly what is capping your visibility. Free, no obligation.
If the audit confirms technical blockers, the next step can be technical SEO, SEO migration support, schema markup, Core Web Vitals, or a separate website speed audit.
Whether search engine bots can actually reach and read every page that matters — robots.txt, redirects, and crawl traps.
Which pages are indexed, which are silently excluded, and whether duplicate or thin pages are diluting your authority.
How your URL structure, internal linking, and navigation help or hurt search engines understanding your site.
Whether schema markup is present, valid, and actually helping you earn rich results.
Not raw speed for its own sake — specifically how your technical health affects ranking eligibility.
Issues ranked by how much crawl budget or ranking potential they are actually costing you.
A technical SEO audit is best when rankings are stuck despite content work, a migration is planned, or the site has crawl, speed, duplicate-content, redirect, schema, or indexation concerns. The goal is to separate true blockers from harmless warnings.
Start here if Search Console shows indexing issues, pages disappeared, or a rebuild is planned.
Send the domain, CMS, recent site changes, and any crawl or ranking symptoms you have noticed.
The useful output is a prioritized technical fix order, not a raw crawler export.
Give us the site you want checked. If you have already noticed pages missing from search or odd crawl behaviour, mention it — it helps us focus the audit.
A short, practical path from request to recommendation.
Your domain, platform, and any migration, crawl, indexing, or ranking concern.
Crawlability, indexation, redirects, architecture, schema, Core Web Vitals, and severity.
A technical diagnosis that separates urgent blockers from nice-to-have fixes.
Robots.txt, sitemaps, indexation status, internal linking, and structured data — the technical foundation search engines rely on.
Technical SEO problems are often invisible in the browser — we surface exactly what is silently capping your visibility.
A short reply on what is broken, how serious it is, and what fixing it would take — no pressure to sign anything.
Request it when rankings are stuck despite content work, pages are not being indexed, a migration or redesign is planned, or crawl, redirect, schema, duplicate-page, or Core Web Vitals issues may be limiting visibility.
Send the domain, CMS or platform, recent site changes, any Search Console symptoms, and whether a migration, redesign, or URL change is planned.
No. The useful output is a prioritized diagnosis that separates genuine search blockers from low-risk crawler noise.
Anonymised client feedback from businesses that needed clearer priorities, sharper pages, and work tied to actual enquiries.
We thought the issue was just traffic. HGM showed us that our product pages were not explaining the offer clearly enough. The changes were practical, the reporting was easy to follow, and the enquiries we got afterwards were a better fit.
We had a long list of SEO tasks and no idea what mattered first. HGM helped us sort the technical issues from the things that were actually stopping people from contacting us. It felt much more useful than another generic audit.
Our services made sense to us internally, but they were confusing on the website. HGM helped us split the pages properly, rewrite the vague sections, and make the next step clearer for visitors. The site finally felt easier to explain.
They did not try to rewrite everything for the sake of it. They pointed out where buyers were likely getting stuck, tightened the calls to action, and made the page feel more trustworthy without making it sound like a sales script.
We had separate people looking at content, tracking, and the website, but no one was joining it up. HGM looked at the whole path and gave us a clear order of fixes. The conversations from the site became easier to qualify.
The most useful part was the directness. We did not need a long presentation full of charts; we needed to know why the pages were not converting and what to fix first. That is what we got.