98,000 organic clicks and 1.03M impressions over 16 months, with daily impressions growing from a few hundred to around 4,000-5,000.
- Client type
- Healthcare
- Channel
- SEO
- Measured over
- 16 months
A healthcare SEO case study on fixing an inconsistent SEO foundation for a multi-location healthcare provider, growing search impressions steadily to 1.03M over 16 months.
98,000 organic clicks and 1.03M impressions over 16 months, with daily impressions growing from a few hundred to around 4,000-5,000.
Years of prior agency work had left traffic unpredictable - occasional spikes followed by drops that made organic unreliable for patient acquisition.
Technical SEO cleanup, service pages rebuilt around real search intent, and an internal linking model connecting treatments, articles, and locations.
98,000 organic clicks and 1.03M impressions over 16 months, with daily impressions growing from a few hundred to around 4,000-5,000.

A practical view of the workstreams behind the result, before the long-form story expands on the details.
We reviewed where healthcare growth was stalling across visibility, content depth, technical health, conversion paths, and measurement.
The SEO work was ordered around the changes most likely to influence qualified demand, not around a generic checklist.
Technical SEO cleanup, service pages rebuilt around real search intent, and an internal linking model connecting treatments, articles, and locations.
98,000 organic clicks and 1.03M impressions over 16 months, with daily impressions growing from a few hundred to around 4,000-5,000.
A healthcare provider offering specialized treatments across multiple locations. Client details are anonymized to protect confidentiality.
Despite years of prior agency work, the website's SEO performance was inconsistent - occasional traffic spikes followed by significant drops, with rankings fluctuating frequently enough that organic traffic could not be relied on for patient acquisition.
Improved crawlability, cleaned up metadata, implemented structured data, and resolved duplicate content issues that were confusing search engines about which pages mattered.
Rebuilt service pages around real search intent, expanding thin pages with the information patients were actually searching for, including FAQs and stronger topical relevance - the same on-page SEO work behind every page in the rebuild.
Built a structured linking model connecting treatments, supporting articles, doctor profiles, and location pages so authority moved through the site instead of staying siloed.
Every layer of SEO was addressed - not just rankings. Fixing the technical foundation, the content depth, and the internal linking together built search visibility that kept growing: clicks still came in bursts early on, but the site was shown in search more often almost every month.
Years of prior agency work had left traffic unpredictable - occasional spikes followed by drops that made organic unreliable for patient acquisition.
Technical SEO cleanup, service pages rebuilt around real search intent, and an internal linking model connecting treatments, articles, and locations.
No. This case study shows what changed in one context. Results depend on the starting website, market, competition, tracking, offer quality, implementation speed, and the buyer journey.
It can be useful as a pattern, but the right plan still depends on the specific market, service mix, proof assets, conversion path, and growth constraint for each business.
Anonymised client feedback from businesses that needed clearer priorities, sharper pages, and work tied to actual enquiries.
We thought the issue was just traffic. HGM showed us that our product pages were not explaining the offer clearly enough. The changes were practical, the reporting was easy to follow, and the enquiries we got afterwards were a better fit.
We had a long list of SEO tasks and no idea what mattered first. HGM helped us sort the technical issues from the things that were actually stopping people from contacting us. It felt much more useful than another generic audit.
Our services made sense to us internally, but they were confusing on the website. HGM helped us split the pages properly, rewrite the vague sections, and make the next step clearer for visitors. The site finally felt easier to explain.
They did not try to rewrite everything for the sake of it. They pointed out where buyers were likely getting stuck, tightened the calls to action, and made the page feel more trustworthy without making it sound like a sales script.
We had separate people looking at content, tracking, and the website, but no one was joining it up. HGM looked at the whole path and gave us a clear order of fixes. The conversations from the site became easier to qualify.
The most useful part was the directness. We did not need a long presentation full of charts; we needed to know why the pages were not converting and what to fix first. That is what we got.
Book a free consultation and we'll map the constraints, channels, and fixes most likely to create measurable progress.